mirror of
https://github.com/penpot/penpot.git
synced 2026-07-31 18:36:18 +00:00
18 lines
1.0 KiB
Markdown
18 lines
1.0 KiB
Markdown
Act as a senior software engineer and perform a thorough code review.
|
|
|
|
## Instructions
|
|
|
|
1. Load the **`code-review-and-quality`** skill — it defines the five axes, core principles (DRY, KISS, YAGNI), severity taxonomy, and output format.
|
|
2. Determine the diff or code to review from the provided context.
|
|
3. Read the diff and the surrounding context for each changed file.
|
|
4. Review across all five axes: correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance.
|
|
5. Produce the review using the **Review Output** format from the skill (Summary → Critical/High → Other Findings → Refactoring → Testing Recommendations → Positive Observations → Final Verdict).
|
|
6. For each finding: state the severity (Critical / High / Medium / Low / Suggestion), identify the file and line, describe failure circumstances, and propose a concrete fix.
|
|
7. Do not invent problems. Every finding must be real and actionable.
|
|
|
|
Do not modify any code and do not create a commit — this command only reviews.
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
$ARGUMENTS
|