alonso.torres b3a93655cf 🐛 Fix the container helpers for copies and components
Fixes in the helpers that walk, instantiate, compare and absorb components
(Phase 3c).

- List each shape once in get-children-in-instance.

  The recursion handed each child the vector built so far, ancestors
  included, and the caller added what came back to its own copy of that
  vector, so every ancestor came back once per child below it (F59). It now
  threads one result through a reduce. Both callers, the repair of
  :shape-ref-cycle and migration legacy-65, make a set of the result, so
  they see the same shapes.

  container-test counts the shapes of an instance.

- Walk every ancestor in has-any-copy-parent?.

  It recursed with the parent's id where it expects a shape, so it only ever
  looked at the direct parent (F63). It now walks up to the root, which is
  its own parent. Users never saw it: every descendant of a copy is a copy,
  so the direct parent gave the right answer.

  container-test checks a shape two levels below the copy.

- Start a new copy without the remote-synced mark of its main.

  Instantiating a component cleared the touched groups of the shapes it
  copies from the main, but not :remote-synced, so a nested copy in the main
  that had been synced from a remote main passed the mark on to every new
  copy of the component, whose shapes refer to their near main (F18).
  make-component-instance now clears it too.

  container-test: a new copy of a component whose nested copy is touched and
  remote-synced has neither mark.

- Compare the stored shapes of components by value.

  mod-component marks a component modified when the change alters any of its
  keys, which ctk/diff-components reports. For :objects, the shapes a
  deleted component stores, it compared the ids found by walking :children,
  a shape format older than the objects map, so it read nil on both sides
  and never saw a change there (F96). It now compares every key, :objects
  included, by value.

  container-test: a change to a stored shape of a deleted component is a
  difference; the same component is none.

- Keep nested copies and annotations of absorbed components.

  When a file absorbs a library's components (the library is deleted, or a
  binfile export merges libraries), each used component gets a main in the
  file, a copy of the library main with the same ids (F89):
  - every shape of that main lost its :shape-ref, so the copies nested in it
    stopped being copies of anything;
  - every head in it was pointed at the local file, even one whose component
    lives in a third library;
  - the component lost its annotation.

  The main now keeps the refs of its nested copies, which with the same ids
  point at the absorbed mains of the components they nest (a file that shows
  a nested copy uses its component, so that one is absorbed too); only heads
  of the absorbed library are pointed at the local file; the annotation is
  copied. A variant still becomes a plain component.

  absorb-assets-test: the nested copy of an absorbed main keeps its ref and
  is a copy of the local component; the annotation stays.

- Say what the component placement rule checks.

  invalid-structure-for-component? said it kept a shape out of its own
  subtree, but its check compares components only: a plain shape moved into
  its own child passes, and the move itself refuses it (F58). The comments
  now say what it checks; the behavior stays, as the layers panel relies on
  it to do nothing for such a drop (decision (s)).

Benchmark (lower quantile, ms; baseline / now / ratio):
  deepest-edit-through-three-levels    35.2 /  17.0 / 0.48
  edit-through-a-chain-of-dependents   68.9 /  33.5 / 0.49
  library-update-into-copies           83.1 /  40.1 / 0.48
  main-edit-among-many-shapes           4.8 /   2.1 / 0.43
  main-edit-into-10-copies              1.8 /   0.8 / 0.47
  main-edit-into-100-copies            15.4 /   8.3 / 0.54
  main-edit-into-1000-copies          153.1 /  82.3 / 0.54
  variant-switch-into-copies           32.1 /  18.6 / 0.58

AI-assisted-by: claude-opus-5-5
2026-10-28 15:53:06 +01:00
2026-09-25 11:11:44 +02:00
2026-09-23 18:53:25 +02:00
2026-10-27 14:59:22 +01:00
2021-11-15 09:54:36 -05:00
2026-10-27 14:59:22 +01:00
2020-08-11 10:11:23 +02:00
2025-01-22 15:46:23 +01:00
2026-07-22 14:18:51 +02:00
2017-03-06 18:42:58 +01:00
2026-10-19 20:10:20 +02:00
2026-10-27 14:59:22 +01:00
2026-10-19 20:10:20 +02:00
2025-06-02 12:09:20 +02:00
2023-11-15 10:55:39 +01:00
2026-10-07 13:02:27 +02:00
2026-10-06 18:09:57 +02:00
2026-06-09 18:48:03 +02:00
2020-08-05 11:19:34 +02:00

Verified DPG Penpot Community Managed with Taiga.io Gitpod ready-to-code

Website • User Guide • Learning Center • Community

Youtube • Peertube • Linkedin • Instagram • Mastodon • Bluesky • X

Penpot video

Penpot is the open-source design platform for teams that build digital products at scale.

Penpot’s key strength lies in giving you full ownership of your design infrastructure. Built on open source and designed for self-hosting, it puts teams in complete control of their design environment supporting strict compliance and governance requirements. Whether used in the browser or deployed on your own servers, Penpot works with open standards like SVG, CSS, HTML, and JSON.

Real-time collaboration strengthens this foundation, helping teams scale and bring design closer to the product through top-tier capabilities. Additionally, developers feel at home using Penpot, because design is expressed as code, enabling a direct translation and shipping products faster.

Best-in-class native Design Tokens provide a single source of truth between design and development. They ensure consistency, improve collaboration, and make it easier to manage complex design systems.

The MCP server takes it further by enabling multi-directional workflows between design and code. A powerful open API and plugin system makes the workspace programmable, enabling automation, AI-driven workflows, and integrations with the tools and systems you already use.

With CSS Grid and Flex Layout, teams can design responsive interfaces that behave like real code from the start.

Combined, these features turn Penpot into a full-stack design platform for building scalable design systems and fully integrated product development processes.

If your organization is scaling and needs extra support, we’re here to help. Talk to us

Table of contents

Why Penpot

Penpot connects design, code, and AI workflows through a code-based approach, making designs readable by developers and AI via the MCP server. This approach helps teams ship what’s actually designed and manage design systems at scale with powerful design tokens. As a self-hosted, open-source and real-time collaboration platform, Penpot offers full flexibility, security, and ownership without vendor lock-in. Learn more about why Penpot is the platform for your team.

Plugin system

Penpot plugins let you expand the platform's capabilities, give you the flexibility to integrate it with other apps, and design custom solutions.

Designed for developers

Penpot was built to serve both designers and developers and create a fluid design-code process. You have the choice to enjoy real-time collaboration or play "solo".

Inspect mode

Work with ready-to-use code and make your workflow easy and fast. The inspect tab gives instant access to SVG, CSS and HTML code.

Integrations

Penpot offers integration into the development toolchain, thanks to its support for webhooks and an API accessible through access tokens.

Building Design Systems: design tokens, components and variants

Penpot brings design systems to code-minded teams: a single source of truth with native Design Tokens, Components, and Variants for scalable, reusable, and consistent UI across projects and platforms.

Penpot Design Systems

Getting started

Penpot is the only design & prototype platform that is deployment agnostic. You can use it in our SAAS or deploy it anywhere.

Learn how to install it with Docker, Kubernetes, Elestio or other options on our website.

Penpot Enterprise

Penpot Enterprise is our paid plan for organizations that need to scale their design work across multiple teams with advanced governance, security, and administration. Manage teams and access from a centralized Admin Console, configure advanced permissions, and connect your identity provider through SSO. Available for cloud and self-hosted environments, it combines enterprise controls with Penpot’s open-source foundation and open standards.

2

Community

We love the Open Source software community. Contributing is our passion and if it’s yours too, participate and improve Penpot. All your designs, code and ideas are welcome!

Want to go a step further? Become a Penpot Ambassador and help grow the Penpot community in your region while contributing to a global, open design ecosystem.

If you need help or have any questions; if you’d like to share your experience using Penpot or get inspired; if you’d rather meet our community of developers and designers, join our Community!

Categories include:

Pentpot Community

Code of Conduct

Anyone who contributes to Penpot, whether through code, in the community, or at an event, must adhere to the code of conduct and foster a positive and safe environment.

Contributing

Any contribution will make a difference to improve Penpot. How can you get involved?

Choose your way:

To find (almost) everything you need to know on how to contribute to Penpot, refer to the contributing guide.

Penpot hub

Resources

You can ask and answer questions, have open-ended conversations, and follow along on decisions affecting the project.

💾 Documentation

🚀 Getting Started

✏️ Tutorials

🏘️ Architecture

📚 Dev Diaries

🧑‍🏫​ UI Design Course

License

This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.

Copyright (c) KALEIDOS SUBSIDIARY SL

Penpot is a Kaleidos’ open source project

Description
Penpot: The open-source design tool for design and code collaboration
Readme MPL-2.0 502 MiB
Languages
Clojure 73.4%
JavaScript 7%
Rust 6.8%
TypeScript 5.8%
SCSS 3.3%
Other 3.6%