mirror of
https://github.com/penpot/penpot.git
synced 2026-07-21 21:47:50 +00:00
* ✨ Add systematic component tests via a composable test model Introduce a framework for systematically testing Penpot component behaviour (synchronisation/propagation, swaps, variant switches, nesting), plus a first suite of cases built on it. A test is expressed as a COMPOSITION OF OPERATIONS over a "situation" (an in-memory file value plus named role bindings). Operations are reified as data and composed by two combinators — `in-sequence` (threads the situation) and `one-of`/`optional` (alternatives, enumerated into concrete variants). So one written case stands for a whole matrix of variants, and coverage grows by composition rather than by copying tests. Operations drive the REAL production change pipeline, and event-operations dispatch the REAL workspace events and await settlement, so the production watcher's automatic propagation is what is exercised — the tests reflect genuine app behaviour, not a reimplementation. Structure (frontend/test/frontend_tests/composable_tests/): - core — the domain-agnostic engine: situation, the operation and enumeration protocols, the combinators, and the runners. - comp/nodes — the component operations (create/instantiate/reset, nesting, swap, the variant ops, child add/remove/move, change, undo, library sync). - comp/setups — component-shaped starting configurations. - interpreter — runs a case against the real frontend store: sync-ops apply directly, event-ops dispatch real events and await settlement (absorbing sync-file's delayed status RPC, which would otherwise leak an error into subsequent tests). - comp/sync-test — the cases (B-F, H, I, K, L, M). This is test-only code with a single consumer — the frontend test suite (the layer that runs the real app) — so it lives entirely under the frontend test tree as .cljs, not under app/common. The framework and its cases are documented in the project memory frontend/composable-component-tests, added alongside. Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * 🐛 Guard WASM mock teardown against an empty snapshot `teardown-wasm-mocks!` unconditionally restored from the `originals` atom. When run without a matching setup (double teardown, or `with-wasm-mocks*` misused around an async test body), the snapshot is empty and every WASM API function was `set!` to nil — permanently, for the remainder of the test run. Any later code calling one of them (e.g. a leaked debounced resize-wasm-text event firing during a subsequent test namespace) then crashed with "initialized? is not a function". Make the restore a no-op when there is nothing to restore. Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>