* 🐛 Fix Plugin API token application for JS array of strings
Plugin code calling `shape.applyToken(token, ["fill"])` or
`token.applyToShapes([rect], ["fill"])` from JavaScript supplies a JS
array of strings. The plugin proxies expected a Clojure set of
keywords, and two coupled defects made the calls silently no-op (or,
with `throwValidationErrors` enabled, throw "check error"):
1. `token-attr-plugin->token-attr` only consulted its alias map when
the input was already a keyword. String inputs like "fill" fell
through to the identity branch, so the downstream
`cto/token-attr?` predicate (which checks against a set of
keywords) returned false for every string. Coerce strings to
keywords first.
2. The `applyToken` / `applyToShapes` / `applyToSelected` schemas
used plain `[:set ...]`, which has no `:decode/json` transformer
for JS array → Clojure set coercion. Switch to the registered
`[::sm/set ...]` (in `app.common.schema`) which provides the
array → set decoder. After the switch, the standard JSON pipeline
converts `["fill"]` to `#{"fill"}`, then the inner
`[:and ::sm/keyword [:fn token-attr?]]` decodes each element to a
keyword and validates it.
Also extends the docstring on `token-attr-plugin->token-attr` to make
the string-friendly contract explicit, and registers a new
`tokens-test` ns under `frontend/test/frontend_tests/plugins/` with
six `deftest` blocks covering:
- known keywords passing through unchanged
- keyword aliases (`:r1` → `:border-radius-top-left`, etc.)
- string inputs coerced to keywords (regression for #9162)
- `token-attr?` accepting both keyword and string inputs
- `token-attr?` rejecting unknown attrs and nil
Closes#9162
* 🐛 Fix wrong direction in plugin-name alias tests
The added tests in tokens_test.cljs and the new docstring in tokens.cljs
described the alias resolution in the wrong direction. The map is
{:r1 :border-radius-top-left, …} then map-invert'd, so
token-attr-plugin->token-attr maps verbose plugin-side names
(:border-radius-top-left) to canonical internal short names (:r1),
not the other way around. Inputs already in canonical form (:r1, :fill,
"fill", …) pass through unchanged. Flipped the alias-resolution test
expectations and the keyword/string-input cases, refreshed the docstring
and the regression-coverage comment to match.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrey Antukh <niwi@niwi.nz>
The plugin parser's parse-point returned a plain `{:x … :y …}` map,
but shape interaction schemas (for example schema:open-overlay-interaction)
require the attribute to be a `::gpt/point` record. `(instance? Point {:x 0 :y 0})`
is false, so validation silently rejected plugin `addInteraction` calls
that passed `manualPositionLocation`; only a console warning was produced.
Change parse-point to return a `gpt/point` record via `gpt/point`.
All three call sites (parser.cljs:open-overlay, plugins/page.cljs,
plugins/comments.cljs) continue to work because Point records support
the same `:x`/`:y` access plain maps do.
Add a unit test that covers nil input and verifies the returned value
satisfies `gpt/point?`.
Github #8409
Signed-off-by: FairyPigDev <luislee3108@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Antukh <niwi@niwi.nz>
Co-authored-by: Andrey Antukh <niwi@niwi.nz>
