2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dr. Dominik Jain
4ea56e0b89
🐛 Fix propagation of geometric changes to rotated component copies (#10574)
* 🐛 Fix geometry sync between mains and rotated component copies

Rotating a copy instance as a whole marked every shape inside it as
touched for geometry, so later geometric changes in the main (e.g. a
resize) were no longer propagated to that copy, while non-geometric
ones (e.g. fills) still were. And on paths where geometry did get
written to a rotated copy (e.g. resetting overrides), the sync engine
compensated only the roots' position delta, so the written values wiped
the copy's rotation back to 0.

Model the instance root's transformation as inherited, overridable
content, asymmetric to position (which remains free per-instance
placement):

- An untouched copy follows the main's transformation verbatim,
  including rotation and flips (preserving the BUG #13267 semantics
  that rotating a main propagates to its copies).

- Transforming a copy as a whole overrides only its ROOT: check-delta
  compares the root's rotation/flips absolutely, but the descendants
  relative to their root, so they merely follow and stay untouched.

- When a copy root's geometry is overridden, update-attrs expresses the
  main's geometry in the copy's own frame: reposition-shape applies the
  roots' relative transformation (rotation/flips) around the dest root
  center in addition to the position delta. Geometric changes from the
  main then keep propagating to the rotated copy, landing correctly in
  its rotated frame instead of destroying its placement.

Covered by the new composable test case
case-n-geometry-sync-with-rotated-instances: an 8-variant sweep over
optional copy rotation, optional main rotation, and one of a fills or
height edit on the main child, asserting the whole model through the
real workspace events (the new rotate operation dispatches
dwt/increase-rotation, whose apply-modifiers step runs the check-delta
classification under test; change-height dispatches
dwt/update-dimensions and implements IPropertyCheck so one-of sweeps
can mix property and geometry edits). Verified by temporarily reverting
the fix: the case then fails with 6 assertion failures and passes again
with the fix restored.

Fixes #10109

AI-assisted-by: claude-fable-5

* 🐛 Fix synchronization problems

---------

Co-authored-by: alonso.torres <alonso.torres@kaleidos.net>
2026-07-21 10:05:31 +02:00
Dr. Dominik Jain
2c15dcdb84
Add systematic component tests via a composable test model (#10529)
*  Add systematic component tests via a composable test model

Introduce a framework for systematically testing Penpot component behaviour
(synchronisation/propagation, swaps, variant switches, nesting), plus a first
suite of cases built on it.

A test is expressed as a COMPOSITION OF OPERATIONS over a "situation" (an
in-memory file value plus named role bindings). Operations are reified as data
and composed by two combinators — `in-sequence` (threads the situation) and
`one-of`/`optional` (alternatives, enumerated into concrete variants). So one
written case stands for a whole matrix of variants, and coverage grows by
composition rather than by copying tests. Operations drive the REAL production
change pipeline, and event-operations dispatch the REAL workspace events and
await settlement, so the production watcher's automatic propagation is what is
exercised — the tests reflect genuine app behaviour, not a reimplementation.

Structure (frontend/test/frontend_tests/composable_tests/):
  - core            — the domain-agnostic engine: situation, the operation and
                      enumeration protocols, the combinators, and the runners.
  - comp/nodes      — the component operations (create/instantiate/reset, nesting,
                      swap, the variant ops, child add/remove/move, change, undo,
                      library sync).
  - comp/setups     — component-shaped starting configurations.
  - interpreter     — runs a case against the real frontend store: sync-ops apply
                      directly, event-ops dispatch real events and await
                      settlement (absorbing sync-file's delayed status RPC, which
                      would otherwise leak an error into subsequent tests).
  - comp/sync-test  — the cases (B-F, H, I, K, L, M).

This is test-only code with a single consumer — the frontend test suite (the
layer that runs the real app) — so it lives entirely under the frontend test
tree as .cljs, not under app/common.

The framework and its cases are documented in the project memory
frontend/composable-component-tests, added alongside.

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* 🐛 Guard WASM mock teardown against an empty snapshot

`teardown-wasm-mocks!` unconditionally restored from the `originals` atom.
When run without a matching setup (double teardown, or `with-wasm-mocks*`
misused around an async test body), the snapshot is empty and every WASM API
function was `set!` to nil — permanently, for the remainder of the test run.
Any later code calling one of them (e.g. a leaked debounced resize-wasm-text
event firing during a subsequent test namespace) then crashed with
"initialized? is not a function".

Make the restore a no-op when there is nothing to restore.

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-10 12:17:43 +02:00