* feat(memory): add Jev pre-screening and signal classification over a shared TypeSafe client
- refactor(typesafe): extract a shared Jev (TypeSafe) client and unify its
configuration: one connection-precedence rule, credential fingerprint, wire-size
counting and error taxonomy, shared by the guardrail gate and the memory hooks.
- feat(memory): wire `memory.prescreen` and `memory.signal_classification` into
DeerMem through one injected judge hook (both off by default, `enforce` gated by
the shadow evaluation).
- config: add the top-level `typesafe:` block and the two judging slots to
`config.example.yaml` and the Helm values, bump `config_version` to 50, and sync
the Helm README example with it.
- test(memory): add the shadow-evaluation script (`eval_memory_prescreen.py`) with
per-stratum gates, censoring and the no-network baseline.
Review follow-ups folded in:
- `mutations_accepted` counts only facts that survive capacity enforcement and the
upload-event scrub that precedes persistence, only removals/reinforcements of ids
that existed, and persisted near-duplicate merges (matched by id, or by identity
for legacy id-less facts); it is published only after persistence succeeds.
- The cached manager hot-reloads its judge when a memory slot or the shared
`typesafe` block changes (including a credential rotation); publication is
serialized and revalidates the config generation, so a build started before an
`enforce` -> `off` rollback cannot land after it.
- Cache provenance is per answer: the `cached` flag and the reported model follow
the answers a side actually consumed, across partial merges and answerless retries.
- An oversized noul integer stays a per-question error instead of raising.
- Incremental call savings use the shared scored denominator.
- The sensitive-stratum gate requires evidence for each of identity, preference
and correction.
* fix(typesafe): resolve one credential per layer and refuse unusable connection values
Review follow-ups on the shared TypeSafe client (#5906):
- A consumer's `api_key_env` is no longer overridden by a literal `api_key` in the
shared `typesafe:` block: the first layer that sets either credential setting
decides it, and inside one layer the literal key wins (the standalone
semantics). A consumer whose endpoint does not accept the block's key no longer
sends it on every call, and the missing-credential message keeps naming the
variable that layer configured.
- `base_url` is validated where it is configured: `http(s)` only, with no query,
fragment, embedded credentials, whitespace or control characters, and a
malformed port fails at construction instead of on every request (httpx raises
`UnsupportedProtocol` / `InvalidURL` per call, and the query would have been
swallowed into the appended endpoint path).
- A credential that cannot travel as a header value — surrounding whitespace from
a secret mounted from a file, a non-printable character — is refused when the
connection resolves. It used to construct fine and then put the whole
`Bearer <key>` value into h11's `LocalProtocolError` message, which the
guardrail middleware's `logger.exception` prints.
- The client raises transport failures without chaining the original exception,
so that message can no longer carry the credential through the cause chain; the
exception type stays in the message for diagnosis.
- `TypeSafeConfig` validates in strict mode, agreeing with the consumer `config`
path: `max_attempts: true` was silently read as `1`. An integer stays a usable
float, so `timeout: 5` keeps working.
Tests: 20 cases across `tests/test_typesafe_config.py` and
`tests/test_typesafe_client.py`, each red on the previous revision and green now.
367 focused typesafe/memory/config tests, `make test-blocking-io` (167) and the
eval-script suites (50) pass; `ruff check` and `ruff format --check` are clean.
Docs synced: `backend/docs/GUARDRAILS.md`, `typesafe/AGENTS.md`,
`config.example.yaml`.
* fix(typesafe,memory): bound the reply, record request failures, gate enforce on the evidence
Second review round on #5906: the remaining items from the review thread and from
the follow-up pass.
Typesafe client (the reply is treated as hostile input too):
- Send `Accept-Encoding: identity`, refuse a body that carries a non-identity
`Content-Encoding`, and read through a bounded `iter_bytes` that stops past
`MAX_RESPONSE_BYTES` (64 KiB). A gzip body that expands to 128 MiB used to be
decoded in full and, on the gate path, allowed the tool call unexamined; it is
now `invalid_response` (a denial with `fail_closed: true`).
- Map `RecursionError` from `json.loads` to `invalid_response`: deep nesting
escaped the module's taxonomy, so the memory consumers lost the round's record
instead of recording a fallback.
Memory judge:
- A request-level failure is recorded as `request_failed`, never `no_verdict`
(`REASON_REQUEST_FAILED` was defined and never emitted, so an unreachable
endpoint was indistinguishable from a provider with no usable answer). The
adapters' `decide()` now propagates `TypeSafeError` for the coordinator to record
and log; `no_verdict` stays for a question-level failure, and an ineligible side
keeps its own reason even when the round's request failed.
Shadow evaluation (the enablement gate reads the evidence, not one number):
- The miss-rate gate requires the exact one-sided Clopper-Pearson upper bound to
meet the 1% target; a sample that only meets the point estimate is
`INSUFFICIENT` (0/250 was reported as a pass with a 1.19% bound).
- New `baseline_incremental_savings` gate: a baseline that saves as many calls as
the model — the shipped all-trivial sample — fails instead of enabling.
- Negative counts (`mutations_accepted`, message / batch / token counts) are
treated as absent rather than scored: `-3` read as "nothing lost", adding a
phantom saving to the numerator and the denominator.
Docs: the design documents cited but absent from the repository are replaced with
in-repo pointers (`MEMORY_IMPROVEMENTS.md`, `agents/memory/AGENTS.md`,
`GUARDRAILS.md`), and the gate and limit wording now matches what the code
enforces.
Tests: 31 new or updated cases, each red on the previous revision (compressed body
refused even when it decodes to a valid envelope, body over the cap refused, body
at the cap answered, deep nesting mapped, `request_failed` on each request-level
failure, the bound and baseline gates, the negative counter). 454 focused tests,
`make test-blocking-io` (167) and the eval suites pass; `ruff check` and
`ruff format --check` are clean.
* fix(memory-eval): pair the baseline comparison on the same records
Review follow-up on the incremental-savings gate added in ed930478 (P2): both
sides of the comparison are now the records the no-network baseline can score
(`trivial_only` plus a readable signals list).
Subtracting that subset's heuristic savings from model savings over *all* scorable
skips credited the model with batches the baseline never saw: 300 reviewed skips
with a single annotated record computed 300-1=299 "incremental", passed the gate
and set `enable_recommended`, while the paired comparison was model=1 against
heuristic=1 (incremental 0).
- `Evidence` carries the paired numbers (`baseline_paired_skips`,
`baseline_model_saved_calls`, `baseline_heuristic_saved_calls`) instead of one
heuristic count, filled by `build_report` from the baseline summary.
- The gate reports `INSUFFICIENT` when no scored skip carries the annotation and
when the annotation covers only a subset of the scored skips (the message carries
the paired counts and the `paired of scored` coverage), `FAIL` on a non-positive
paired gain, and `PASS` only on a positive gain over the full paired set.
- Docs state the pairing/coverage requirement in
`backend/docs/MEMORY_IMPROVEMENTS.md` and in the script docstring.
Tests: the reviewer's counterexample as a report-level regression (it failed with
`assert 'PASS' == 'INSUFFICIENT'` on ed930478 while `enable_recommended` was true),
a unit case for the paired-subset `INSUFFICIENT`, and the renamed paired fields.
344 focused tests, `make test-blocking-io` (167) and the eval suites pass;
`ruff check` / `ruff format --check` clean.
* fix(typesafe): bound the sync body read by the deadline
`deadline_seconds` only covered the sync path's headers, the completed body and
the parse, so an endpoint that drips bytes just under the read timeout held the
caller for one read per piece — the whole of `MAX_RESPONSE_BYTES` past the budget.
The read loop now checks the budget before every transport read, which bounds the
overshoot to one read. The pieces are the transport's own reads, not re-chunked
output: `iter_bytes(chunk_size)` pulls many reads inside a single yielded chunk,
so a check at that granularity would never see a drip.
`tests/test_typesafe_client.py` pins it with a valid envelope delivered as 24
pieces of 50 ms against a 0.2 s deadline: red before (24 pieces pulled), green now
(~5), on both the sync and async paths. Docstring and `typesafe/AGENTS.md` track
the new granularity.
* fix(memory): read the YAML off spelling, and veto a skip over the whole batch
Two review findings on the memory judging path.
`memory.prescreen.mode` / `memory.signal_classification.mode` rejected the
`mode: off` spelling `config.example.yaml` ships and a rollback types: YAML 1.1
parses the unquoted value as a boolean, so both fields saw `False`. The failed
reload left the previous judge running, so both fields now normalize `False` to
`off` before the `Literal` runs. `True` stays a validation error (no mode it
could mean). The examples quote the value, and the docs record why.
The pre-screen's L3 veto read `detect_signals`' 6-message window while the batch
it answers for is the whole post-watermark feed, so an explicit correction in an
earlier turn of an eight-message batch did not stop the skip that then advanced
the watermark past it. `detect_signals` gains a `window` parameter (default
unchanged) and the updater scans the full feed for the veto; the extraction hint
and the reinforcement gate keep the window.
Both regressions are red on the previous head: the config test reproduced the
`input_value=False` rejection through `AppConfig.from_file`, and the batch test
reproduced the prescreen judging (and skipping) a batch whose first turn carries
the correction.