mirror of
https://github.com/bytedance/deer-flow.git
synced 2026-06-10 01:22:09 +00:00
f97b0c0f74
Replace the single runtime-information form with: - config.yml: disable blank issues, route Q&A/ideas to Discussions, link security policy - bug-report.yml: reproducible bug form (folds in the old runtime/environment fields + affected-area picker) - feature-request.yml: scoped proposal form Uses only default labels (bug/enhancement) so it is self-contained.
68 lines
1.9 KiB
YAML
68 lines
1.9 KiB
YAML
name: 💡 Feature request
|
|
description: Propose a new capability or an improvement to an existing one.
|
|
title: "[feat] "
|
|
labels: ["enhancement"]
|
|
body:
|
|
- type: markdown
|
|
attributes:
|
|
value: |
|
|
Thanks for the suggestion. For non-trivial features, please open a
|
|
[Discussion](https://github.com/bytedance/deer-flow/discussions/categories/ideas)
|
|
first to align on scope before writing code.
|
|
|
|
- type: checkboxes
|
|
id: preflight
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Before you start
|
|
options:
|
|
- label: I searched [existing issues](https://github.com/bytedance/deer-flow/issues?q=is%3Aissue) and this is not a duplicate.
|
|
required: true
|
|
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: problem
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Problem / motivation
|
|
description: What problem does this solve? What is painful today, or what does it unblock?
|
|
placeholder: "I'm always frustrated when ..."
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: solution
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Proposed solution
|
|
description: Describe the change from a user's / caller's perspective.
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
|
|
- type: dropdown
|
|
id: areas
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Affected area(s)
|
|
description: Which part of DeerFlow would this touch? Select all that apply.
|
|
multiple: true
|
|
options:
|
|
- Frontend (UI / Next.js)
|
|
- Backend API (gateway / endpoints / SSE)
|
|
- Agents / LangGraph (graph, prompts, langgraph.json)
|
|
- Sandbox / Docker
|
|
- Skills
|
|
- MCP
|
|
- Config / setup
|
|
- Docs
|
|
- Not sure
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: alternatives
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Alternatives considered
|
|
description: Other approaches you weighed and why you discarded them.
|
|
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: additional
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Additional context
|
|
description: Mockups, links, related issues, or anything else that helps.
|