deer-flow/backend/tests/test_rbac_authorization_provider.py
Zeren Wang 82671596f3
feat(authz): add plugin resource targets, provenance, action and management enforcement (#5842)
* feat(authz): add plugin resource targets, provenance, action and management enforcement

PR1 of the extension-tool-authorization series
(docs/plans/2026-09-24-extension-tool-authorization-spec.md): plugin
authorization plumbing, no new author-facing declaration.

- `authz/plugin_targets.py` is the single encoder/validator for composite
  targets (`namespace/part`), with one validating composer behind three
  kind-checked constructors; invalid input raises instead of degrading.
- `authz/plugin_authz.py` is the harness decision layer (`plugin_action`,
  `plugin_management`, plus the batch filters the page slice will consume):
  disabled is a no-op, an explicit deny raises, and provider errors follow
  `fail_closed` like the sandbox gate.
- `POST /api/plugins/{ns}/actions/{name}` decides `plugin_action:invoke`
  after the action resolves and before the body is streamed.
- `deerflow_extension_api.auth` publishes `require_plugin_management` /
  `arequire_plugin_management` with two `app.state` resolver keys; the
  Gateway installs both. Contract version 0.2.3 -> 0.2.4.
- `tools/tool_provenance.py` records host-written plugin provenance for
  display (assembly descriptor, Layer-2 context later); no decision reads a
  label.
- Plugin providers use a `(config signature, loop key)` cache so a
  loop-affine provider is never handed to another loop or to a sync caller.
- RBAC gains `plugin_actions` / `plugin_management` aliases;
  `config_version` 47 -> 48 across the three mirrors.

Tests: new plugin target/provenance/action/management suites plus a
blocking-IO anchor whose offloads were reverted to prove red->green.

* fix(authz): decide plugin resources from the request's config snapshot

Review round 1 on PR #5842 (willem-bd).

P1 — the decision layer no longer reloads the configuration. The six
`authz/plugin_authz.py` functions take a required `app_config` snapshot (the
same request-scoped config the Gateway used to resolve the provider), and
`resolve_/aresolve_plugin_authorization` return it as a third element, so
`enabled`/`fail_closed` can never come from a second read that drifted from
the one that produced the provider. A snapshot the caller could not read at
all is *unavailable*, not disabled: it fails closed as
`authz.config_unavailable`. The Gateway's `_plugin_app_config` now separates
an absent `config.yaml` (no gate, today's behavior) from a config that exists
but cannot be read or validated (deny) instead of swallowing both through
`safe_app_config`.

P2 — `_validated_decision` requires `type(decision.allow) is bool` on both
the sync `authorize` and async `aauthorize` paths, so a provider returning
`AuthzDecision(allow="false")` is a malformed verdict that follows
`fail_closed` instead of being read as an allow.

Both fixes are covered by regression tests that were verified red against the
pre-fix behavior (P1: 200 vs 403 and resolver True vs False; P2: 12 cases
across fail_closed/fail_open and sync/async), plus tests pinning that an
absent config and `authorization.enabled: false` keep today's behavior.

* fix(authz): treat a request-time config absence as unavailable

Review round 2 on PR #5842 (willem-bd).

P1 — `_plugin_app_config[_async]` no longer maps a missing `config.yaml` to
`None` ("no gate"). A Gateway cannot have started without a readable config
(`app/gateway/app.py` reads it through this same accessor in `lifespan`), so
absence *during a request* means the configuration this process was running on
became unavailable — a hot reload, an atomic replace, a ConfigMap remount. It is
unavailable, not disabled: the error propagates,
`resolve_/aresolve_plugin_authorization` raise
`_PluginAuthorizationUnavailable(fail_closed=True)`, the action dispatcher
returns 403 and the management resolvers answer `False`. The dead
`(None, None, None)` allow path is gone, the resolvers return a non-optional
`AppConfig` as their third element, and callers key "authorization disabled" on
`provider is None` alone. This matches the rule the decision layer already
documented (`authz.config_unavailable`) and the public docs.

P2 — `_deny_reason_code` is total: a `reasons` that is not iterable degrades the
code to `authz.denied` instead of raising `TypeError` outside the guarded
provider path, which turned a denial into an unhandled error. It is deliberately
not folded into `_validated_decision`: `allow` was a real `bool`, so the verdict
is a valid denial, and treating it as malformed would flip it to an allow under
`fail_closed: false`.

Both fixes are covered by regression tests verified red against the pre-fix
behavior (P1: resolver True vs False, async `PermissionError` not raised, route
200 vs 403; P2: `TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable` at
`plugin_authz.py:113`). The action-route tests in
`tests/test_plugin_contributions.py` now install a readable
`authorization.enabled: false` config instead of relying on a config-less
process, and `docs/full-stack-plugins.md` plus the PR1 decision log record the
new rule.

* fix(authz): apply the running policy when the plugin config is unreadable

Follow-up to f03d2ea9 (review round 2 on PR #5842, willem-bd).

The first attempt read the P1 finding as "absence is never disabled" and failed
every config read closed unconditionally. That is too broad for this repo: a
config-less host is deliberately treated as having no policy to apply
(`_get_route_authorization_config` falls back to a disabled config,
`sandbox_authz.safe_app_config` documents the same no-op for "CI runners and
direct-call tests"), and the rule turned the config-less e2e plugin host
(`extension_test_fixtures.bookmark_plugin_gateway`) into a 403 — the three
`bookmark-plugin.spec.ts` cases lost the save action. Reproduced locally:
`POST /api/plugins/community.bookmarks/actions/save` against that fixture host
returned 403 before, 200 after this change.

The rule is now "has this process loaded a configuration?", not "was the last
read successful?":

- No loaded config (`peek_loaded_app_config()`, new read-only accessor on
  `deerflow.config.app_config`) and no `config.yaml`: no policy to apply, so the
  gate stays a no-op — unchanged for CI runners, direct-call tests and hosts
  that mount only the plugins router.
- A loaded config whose file disappears or cannot be read: *unavailable*, never
  *disabled*. The resolvers raise `_PluginAuthorizationUnavailable` carrying the
  failure flag of the configuration this process runs on (authorization
  disabled there -> no gate; enabled -> that policy's `fail_closed`, `True` by
  default), so an enabled Gateway answers 403/False in the window instead of
  letting protected plugin actions and management routes through.
- A config file that exists but cannot be read or validated right now: fail
  closed when nothing is loaded (round 1's rule), otherwise the loaded policy
  decides.

`peek_loaded_app_config()` is preferred over a Gateway-side startup snapshot: it
reflects the last successfully loaded config, so a hot-reloaded policy is what
applies during the window, and there is no lifecycle hook to keep in sync.

Evidence: the three no-config/lost-config branches in
`tests/test_plugin_management_guard.py` and
`tests/test_plugin_action_authorization.py`, round 1's unreadable-config tests
unchanged, `test_peek_loaded_app_config_survives_a_missing_file` in
`tests/test_app_config_reload.py`, and the fixture-host probe above. Docs
(`docs/full-stack-plugins.md`, `reference.mdx` en/zh) and the PR1 decision log
state the final rule; the log records the superseded variant.

* fix(authz): keep a denial whose reasons raise while being read

* fix(authz): intersect plugin batch filters with the candidates

The plugin_page/plugin_management batch helpers returned the provider's
`filter_resources` answer verbatim, so a custom provider could hand the
projections a target that was never asked about ("*", another namespace,
a phantom page). Every other filter call site re-projects from its own
candidate list; do the same here, state the intersection on the provider
contract, and pin it with a regression test that fails on the old
pass-through.

* docs(plugins): map a management denial to 403 in the route example

The contributed-route example called `arequire_plugin_management` and let
the documented `PermissionError` escape. The Gateway installs no
`PermissionError` handler, so a route copied from the example answered 500
on a normal policy denial instead of 403. Both example routes now translate
the denial, and the surrounding bullets say why the translation is the
route's job.

* docs(extensions): point the 0.2.4 contract row at the PR that ships it

Every other row in the version-history table links the pull request that
shipped the version; 0.2.4 linked the authorization tracking issue instead.
Both the English and Chinese tables now link this PR.
2026-09-25 14:46:12 +08:00

452 lines
20 KiB
Python

"""Tests for the built-in RbacAuthorizationProvider."""
from __future__ import annotations
import asyncio
import pytest
from deerflow.authz.provider import AuthzRequest, Principal
from deerflow.authz.rbac import RbacAuthorizationProvider
# --- Helpers ---
def _make_request(
*,
role: str = "user",
resource: str = "tool",
action: str = "call",
target: str = "bash",
) -> AuthzRequest:
return AuthzRequest(
principal=Principal(role=role),
resource=resource,
action=action,
target=target,
)
def _provider(roles: dict) -> RbacAuthorizationProvider:
return RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles=roles)
# --- Allow semantics ---
class TestAllowSemantics:
"""Verify all forms of `allow` configuration."""
def test_wildcard_allow(self):
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": "*"}}})
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="bash")).allow is True
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="write_file")).allow is True
def test_boolean_true_allow(self):
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": True}}})
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="bash")).allow is True
def test_boolean_false_deny_all(self):
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": False}}})
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="bash")).allow is False
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="web_search")).allow is False
def test_list_allow(self):
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": ["web_search", "read_file"]}}})
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="web_search")).allow is True
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="read_file")).allow is True
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="bash")).allow is False
def test_empty_list_deny_all(self):
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": []}}})
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="bash")).allow is False
def test_allow_missing_defaults_to_allow_all(self):
"""Missing `allow` means unrestricted (deny still applies)."""
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"deny": ["bash"]}}})
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="bash")).allow is False
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="web_search")).allow is True
# --- Deny semantics ---
class TestDenySemantics:
"""Deny always wins over allow."""
def test_deny_overrides_wildcard(self):
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": "*", "deny": ["bash"]}}})
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="bash")).allow is False
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="web_search")).allow is True
def test_deny_overrides_list_allow(self):
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": ["bash", "web_search"], "deny": ["bash"]}}})
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="bash")).allow is False
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="web_search")).allow is True
def test_deny_overrides_boolean_true(self):
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": True, "deny": ["bash"]}}})
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="bash")).allow is False
# --- Resource mapping ---
class TestResourceMapping:
"""tool → tools, model → models, etc."""
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
("request_alias", "config_key"),
[
("tool", "tools"),
("model", "models"),
("skill", "skills"),
("mcp_server", "mcp_servers"),
("route", "routes"),
("plugin_action", "plugin_actions"),
],
)
def test_reserved_request_alias_is_rejected(self, request_alias, config_key):
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match=rf"resource key '{request_alias}'.*use '{config_key}'"):
_provider({"user": {request_alias: {"allow": []}}})
def test_alias_is_rejected_when_mapped_key_is_also_configured(self):
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match=r"resource key 'tool'.*use 'tools'"):
_provider(
{
"user": {
"tools": {"allow": "*"},
"tool": {"allow": []},
}
}
)
def test_same_name_mapping_is_valid(self):
p = _provider({"user": {"sandbox": {"allow": []}}})
assert p.authorize(_make_request(resource="sandbox", target="default")).allow is False
def test_tool_maps_to_tools(self):
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": ["web_search"]}}})
assert p.authorize(_make_request(resource="tool", target="web_search")).allow is True
assert p.authorize(_make_request(resource="tool", target="bash")).allow is False
def test_model_maps_to_models(self):
p = _provider({"user": {"models": {"allow": ["gpt-4o"]}}})
assert p.authorize(_make_request(resource="model", target="gpt-4o")).allow is True
def test_unknown_resource_uses_original_name(self):
p = _provider({"user": {"custom_resource": {"allow": ["item1"]}}})
assert p.authorize(_make_request(resource="custom_resource", target="item1")).allow is True
def test_resource_config_missing_means_unrestricted(self):
"""If a role has no policy for a resource type, it's unrestricted."""
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": ["web_search"]}}})
# No model policy configured → unrestricted
assert p.authorize(_make_request(resource="model", target="any")).allow is True
def test_plugin_action_maps_to_plugin_actions(self):
"""The request resource is singular; the config key is plural."""
p = _provider({"user": {"plugin_actions": {"allow": ["community.check/check"]}}})
request = _make_request(resource="plugin_action", action="invoke", target="community.check/check")
assert p.authorize(request).allow is True
assert p.authorize(_make_request(resource="plugin_action", action="invoke", target="community.check/other")).allow is False
assert p.filter_resources(Principal(role="user"), "plugin_action", ["community.check/check", "community.check/other"]) == ["community.check/check"]
def test_plugin_actions_alias_direction_denies_when_empty(self):
"""A reversed alias would silently allow; the mapping is request → config key."""
p = _provider({"user": {"plugin_actions": {"allow": []}}})
assert p.authorize(_make_request(resource="plugin_action", action="invoke", target="community.check/check")).allow is False
def test_plugin_management_is_self_mapped(self):
"""Key == resource is legal (same shape as ``sandbox``)."""
p = _provider({"user": {"plugin_management": {"allow": ["community.check/permissions.read"]}}})
allowed = p.authorize(_make_request(resource="plugin_management", action="read", target="community.check/permissions.read"))
denied = p.authorize(_make_request(resource="plugin_management", action="write", target="community.check/permissions.write"))
assert allowed.allow is True
assert denied.allow is False
def test_plugin_management_separates_read_from_write_by_target(self):
"""The built-in provider ignores ``action``, so authority must differ by target."""
from deerflow.authz.plugin_targets import MANAGEMENT_READ_PART, MANAGEMENT_WRITE_PART, plugin_management_target
read_target = plugin_management_target("community.check", MANAGEMENT_READ_PART)
write_target = plugin_management_target("community.check", MANAGEMENT_WRITE_PART)
p = _provider({"user": {"plugin_management": {"allow": [read_target]}}})
assert p.authorize(_make_request(resource="plugin_management", action="read", target=read_target)).allow is True
# The same call under the write action is still denied: the target carries the authority.
assert p.authorize(_make_request(resource="plugin_management", action="write", target=write_target)).allow is False
assert p.authorize(_make_request(resource="plugin_management", action="write", target=read_target)).allow is True
# --- Role resolution ---
class TestRoleResolution:
"""Unknown and missing roles must fail."""
def test_known_role_works(self):
p = _provider({"admin": {"tools": {"allow": "*"}}, "user": {"tools": {"allow": []}}})
assert p.authorize(_make_request(role="admin", target="bash")).allow is True
assert p.authorize(_make_request(role="user", target="bash")).allow is False
def test_unknown_role_raises(self):
"""Unknown role must raise ValueError, not return allow."""
p = _provider({"admin": {"tools": {"allow": "*"}}})
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Unknown role"):
p.authorize(_make_request(role="editor", target="bash"))
def test_missing_role_raises(self):
"""None role must raise ValueError."""
p = _provider({"admin": {"tools": {"allow": "*"}}})
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="no role"):
p.authorize(_make_request(role=None, target="bash"))
def test_empty_string_role_raises(self):
p = _provider({"admin": {"tools": {"allow": "*"}}})
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="no role"):
p.authorize(_make_request(role="", target="bash"))
# --- filter_resources ---
class TestFilterResources:
"""Batch visibility filter."""
def test_filter_preserves_order(self):
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": ["web_search", "bash", "read_file"]}}})
result = p.filter_resources(Principal(role="user"), "tool", ["bash", "web_search", "write_file", "read_file"])
assert result == ["bash", "web_search", "read_file"]
def test_filter_no_duplicates_added(self):
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": "*"}}})
result = p.filter_resources(Principal(role="user"), "tool", ["a", "b"])
assert result == ["a", "b"]
def test_filter_preserves_input_duplicates(self):
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": "*"}}})
result = p.filter_resources(Principal(role="user"), "tool", ["a", "a", "b"])
assert result == ["a", "a", "b"]
def test_filter_does_not_modify_input(self):
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": ["a"]}}})
candidates = ["a", "b", "c"]
p.filter_resources(Principal(role="user"), "tool", candidates)
assert candidates == ["a", "b", "c"]
def test_filter_unrestricted_when_no_policy(self):
p = _provider({"admin": {}})
result = p.filter_resources(Principal(role="admin"), "tool", ["a", "b"])
assert result == ["a", "b"]
def test_filter_consistent_with_authorize(self):
"""filter_resources result must match per-item authorize decisions."""
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": "*", "deny": ["bash"]}}})
candidates = ["bash", "web_search", "read_file", "write_file"]
filtered = p.filter_resources(Principal(role="user"), "tool", candidates)
per_item = [c for c in candidates if p.authorize(_make_request(target=c)).allow]
assert filtered == per_item
@pytest.mark.parametrize("role", [None, ""])
def test_filter_missing_role_raises(self, role):
"""Visibility filtering propagates missing-role errors like authorize."""
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": "*"}}})
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="no role"):
p.filter_resources(Principal(role=role), "tool", ["bash"])
def test_filter_unknown_role_raises(self):
"""Visibility filtering propagates unknown-role errors like authorize."""
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": "*"}}})
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Unknown role"):
p.filter_resources(Principal(role="editor"), "tool", ["bash"])
@pytest.mark.parametrize("resource_type", [None, ""])
def test_filter_invalid_resource_type_raises(self, resource_type):
p = _provider({"user": {}})
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="resource_type must be a non-empty string"):
p.filter_resources(Principal(role="user"), resource_type, ["bash"])
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"roles",
[
{"user": {}},
{"user": {"tools": {"allow": "*"}}},
{"user": {"tools": {"allow": ["bash"]}}},
],
ids=["unrestricted", "wildcard", "allow-list"],
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize("candidates", [["bash", None], ["bash", ""]], ids=["null", "empty"])
def test_filter_invalid_candidate_raises_for_every_policy_shape(self, roles, candidates):
p = _provider(roles)
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match=r"candidates\[1\] must be a non-empty string"):
p.filter_resources(Principal(role="user"), "tool", candidates)
@pytest.mark.parametrize("candidates", [None, ("bash",), "bash"])
def test_filter_non_list_candidates_raises(self, candidates):
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": "*"}}})
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="candidates must be a list"):
p.filter_resources(Principal(role="user"), "tool", candidates)
# --- Request validation ---
class TestRequestValidation:
"""Malformed request identifiers must fail before any allow decision."""
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"roles",
[
{"user": {}},
{"user": {"tools": {"allow": "*"}}},
{"user": {"tools": {"allow": ["bash"]}}},
],
ids=["unrestricted", "wildcard", "allow-list"],
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize("target", [None, ""], ids=["null", "empty"])
def test_authorize_invalid_target_raises_for_every_policy_shape(self, roles, target):
p = _provider(roles)
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="target must be a non-empty string"):
p.authorize(_make_request(target=target))
@pytest.mark.parametrize("resource", [None, ""], ids=["null", "empty"])
def test_authorize_invalid_resource_raises(self, resource):
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": "*"}}})
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="resource must be a non-empty string"):
p.authorize(_make_request(resource=resource))
@pytest.mark.parametrize("target", [None, ""], ids=["null", "empty"])
def test_aauthorize_invalid_target_matches_sync_validation(self, target):
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": "*"}}})
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="target must be a non-empty string"):
asyncio.run(p.aauthorize(_make_request(target=target)))
# --- Sync / async parity ---
class TestSyncAsyncParity:
def test_aauthorize_matches_authorize(self):
p = _provider({"user": {"tools": {"allow": "*", "deny": ["bash"]}}})
req = _make_request(target="bash")
sync = p.authorize(req)
async_ = asyncio.run(p.aauthorize(req))
assert sync.allow == async_.allow
assert sync.reasons[0].code == async_.reasons[0].code
# --- Construction validation ---
class TestConstructionValidation:
"""Invalid config must fail at construction, not at request time."""
def test_unknown_provider_config_key_raises(self):
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="unknown provider config keys.*bogus"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles={"user": {}}, bogus=True)
def test_misspelled_roles_key_raises(self):
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="unknown provider config keys.*rolez"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(rolez={"user": {}})
def test_non_dict_roles_raises(self):
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="roles must be a dict"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles=["not", "a", "dict"])
def test_non_dict_role_config_raises(self):
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="config must be a dict"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles={"user": "not a dict"})
def test_non_dict_resource_policy_raises(self):
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="must be a dict"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles={"user": {"tools": "not a dict"}})
def test_invalid_allow_type_raises(self):
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="allow must be"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles={"user": {"tools": {"allow": 42}}})
def test_invalid_allow_string_raises(self):
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="allow string must be"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles={"user": {"tools": {"allow": "not_wildcard"}}})
def test_non_string_in_allow_list_raises(self):
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="non-string"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles={"user": {"tools": {"allow": ["ok", 42]}}})
def test_non_string_in_deny_list_raises(self):
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="non-string"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles={"user": {"tools": {"deny": ["ok", None]}}})
def test_empty_string_in_allow_list_raises(self):
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="non-string or empty"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles={"user": {"tools": {"allow": ["ok", ""]}}})
def test_invalid_deny_type_raises(self):
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="deny must be"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles={"user": {"tools": {"deny": 42}}})
def test_empty_role_name_raises(self):
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="non-empty string"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles={"": {"tools": {"allow": "*"}}})
def test_empty_resource_key_raises(self):
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="invalid resource key"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles={"user": {"": {"allow": "*"}}})
def test_explicit_null_allow_raises(self):
"""`allow: null` must NOT be treated as missing — it's a config error."""
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="allow must not be null"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles={"user": {"tools": {"allow": None}}})
def test_explicit_null_deny_raises(self):
"""`deny: null` must NOT be treated as missing — it's a config error."""
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="deny must not be null"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles={"user": {"tools": {"allow": "*", "deny": None}}})
def test_unknown_policy_key_raises(self):
"""Misspelled keys (e.g. 'alow') must be rejected, not silently ignored."""
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="unknown policy keys"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles={"user": {"tools": {"alow": ["web_search"]}}})
def test_unknown_policy_key_with_valid_keys_raises(self):
"""Unknown key alongside valid keys must still be rejected."""
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="unknown policy keys"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles={"user": {"tools": {"allow": "*", "permt": ["extra"]}}})
def test_mixed_type_unknown_keys_raises_value_error(self):
"""Mixed-type unknown keys (e.g. str + int) must raise ValueError,
not TypeError from sorted() comparison failure."""
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="unknown policy keys"):
RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles={"user": {"tools": {1: "bad", "other": "bad"}}})
# --- Config immutability ---
class TestConfigImmutability:
"""Provider must not be affected by post-construction config mutation."""
def test_mutating_config_after_construction_does_not_change_behavior(self):
roles_config = {"user": {"tools": {"allow": ["bash"]}}}
p = RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles=roles_config)
# Mutate the original config
roles_config["user"]["tools"]["allow"] = ["web_search"]
roles_config["admin"] = {"tools": {"allow": "*"}}
# Provider should still use the original compiled policy
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="bash")).allow is True
assert p.authorize(_make_request(target="web_search")).allow is False
# Unknown role added to config should not be known to provider
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Unknown role"):
p.authorize(_make_request(role="admin", target="bash"))
# --- Protocol conformance ---
class TestProtocolConformance:
def test_rbac_is_authorization_provider(self):
from deerflow.authz.provider import AuthorizationProvider
assert isinstance(RbacAuthorizationProvider(roles={}), AuthorizationProvider)