rayhpeng a328af2917 refactor(schedule): wire the slice through adapters and delete the old path
The outer ring: SQL repositories, the run launcher, the thread lookup,
and the run-completion listener implementing the ports the domain
declared, plus the HTTP router and the poller driving them. All of it is
instantiated in one composition root, so no route or lifespan hook
builds an adapter of its own.

With the ports filled, the pre-hexagonal implementation is deleted
rather than left alongside: `app/scheduler/service.py` and its router
mixed policy, persistence, and HTTP into one class, which is why its
rules were only reachable through a live database.

Two bugs that shape hid are fixed here: a completion hook that replayed
a stale snapshot and rolled the launch write back, and a corrupt stored
row surfacing to the client as a 4xx. The concurrency invariants are
pinned by contract suites that run each port against both the fake and
real sqlite, plus dedicated dispatch-race tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-31 11:44:08 +08:00

47 lines
2.0 KiB
Python

"""Secondary adapter (anti-corruption layer) -- narrowing ThreadMetaStore to ThreadLookup.
Implements ``ThreadLookup`` from ``deerflow.domain.schedule.ports``. This
context does not own the ``threads_meta`` table and writes no SQL against it: it
asks its one question through the store the thread context already provides.
``require_existing=True`` is the load-bearing argument. The store's default
treats an absent row as accessible -- reasonable for a thread that has not been
written yet, wrong for binding a task to it, since the task would then reference
a thread that never existed.
TODO(hexagonal): this depends on ``ThreadMetaStore``, an infrastructure
component, rather than on a contract published by the thread context -- that
context has not been through a hexagonal slice yet. When it publishes one (a
DTO, not its aggregate and not its repository), replace the body of this class.
The ``ThreadLookup`` port does not move.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
from deerflow.domain.schedule.ports import ThreadLookup
if TYPE_CHECKING:
from deerflow.persistence.thread_meta.base import ThreadMetaStore
class ThreadStoreThreadLookup(ThreadLookup):
"""Adapts the wide ``ThreadMetaStore`` to the one question this context asks.
Both halves of that question -- does the thread exist, and may this user use
it -- collapse into a single bool on purpose: reporting them separately
would let a caller probe for the existence of threads they cannot see.
Explicit inheritance is a readability aid only: a misspelled method would
still instantiate fine and silently inherit the Protocol's ``...`` body,
so the contract tests must call every port method and assert on what it
returns.
"""
def __init__(self, thread_store: ThreadMetaStore) -> None:
self._thread_store = thread_store
async def exists_for_user(self, thread_id: str, user_id: str) -> bool:
return bool(await self._thread_store.check_access(thread_id, user_id, require_existing=True))