5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Totoro
5b591a9039
feat(gateway): accept conversation references in run context and report the capability (#5463)
* feat(gateway): accept conversation references in run context and report the capability

LangGraph SDK clients build a fixed run body and drop unknown top-level
fields, so they cannot send the conversation_references field from #5399.
RunCreateRequest now lifts context.conversation_references into the
top-level field before validation, so it keeps the same bounds and error
locations, and drops it from context, so it never reaches the merged run
context or the checkpointed configurable. Sending both is a 422.

GET /api/features reports conversation_references {enabled, max_references}
with the same "tool is configured" predicate as run admission, so a client
can hide an entry point on deployments without the tool.

Related to #5398.

* fix(gateway): report the field type error for a malformed top-level reference list

A malformed top-level conversation_references sent alongside a context
list now fails with the field's own type error instead of the conflict
message. The tool-configured predicate reads tool.use directly, and the
features test doubles carry that attribute like every real ToolConfig.

* fix(gateway): treat every list-like top-level reference value as a conflict

Pydantic's lax mode coerces tuples, sets, frozensets and deques into the
list[str] field, so a direct Python caller passing one of those together
with context.conversation_references now reports the conflict instead of
slipping both grants through. Unreachable over HTTP, where JSON has no
such types.

* fix(gateway): ask pydantic whether a top-level reference value is list-like

Enumerating list-like types cannot track pydantic's lax acceptance set
(generators, UserList, dict key views also coerce into list[str]). The
conflict guard now validates the top-level value with a TypeAdapter for
list[Any]: whatever pydantic would coerce reports the conflict when it is
non-empty, and whatever it rejects still surfaces the field's own type
error. Regression tests cover deque, UserList, dict keys and a generator,
plus rejected scalars.

* fix(gateway): probe top-level references with the field's own annotation

The conflict guard now validates the top-level value with the exact item
annotation the field uses, so its acceptance set is the field's rather than
a superset: an item the field rejects (an empty string, a non-string, the
ints of a range or dict view) surfaces the field's own item error instead
of a conflict. The annotation is shared through one alias so the two cannot
drift.

* fix(gateway): materialise a one-shot iterator before probing top-level references

The item-validating probe could consume a generator while collecting an
item error, after which the field re-validated the exhausted iterator,
coerced it to [] and let the request through with the key still in
context. Iterators are now read once into a list that both the probe and
the field validate, so a bad item is reported at its index and a valid
generator is kept.

* fix(gateway): materialise every once-walkable iterable before probing references

Pydantic coerces any iterable into the list field, and an object whose
__iter__ hands out a generator once is not an Iterator instance, so the
previous gate let it reach the probe and be consumed. The lift now reads
every iterable except lists, tuples and the shapes the field rejects as a
whole (str, bytes, dict) into a list first, so the probe and the field
always validate the same items.

---------

Co-authored-by: Totoro-qaq <279883115+Totoro-qaq@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-16 15:37:57 +08:00
Totoro
533e30e7f2
[feat] add opt-in conversation reads for Gateway runs (#5399)
* feat: add scoped conversation reads to gateway runs

* refactor: share conversation tool path and reuse parsed text

---------

Co-authored-by: Totoro-qaq <279883115+Totoro-qaq@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-09-14 10:51:01 +08:00
Vanzeren
095092418c
fix(gateway):unify thread id validation (#4589)
* fix(gateway): unify thread ID validation at the API boundary

Thread ID entry points accepted arbitrary strings while downstream
consumers (filesystem paths, Kubernetes Provisioner, JSONL event store)
each enforced different character restrictions, so invalid IDs were
persisted first and only failed later during sandbox/workspace init.

Centralize validation in deerflow.utils.thread_id (pattern
^[A-Za-z0-9_-]{1,64}$): validate at routers, RunCreateRequest,
scheduler dispatch, paths.py, JSONL store, embedded client, and align
the Provisioner pattern (pinned by a parity test). UUIDs are still
generated only when no ID is supplied; caller-supplied opaque IDs stay
supported.

Deliberate exceptions: DELETE /threads/{id} keeps str as the legacy
cleanup escape hatch (filesystem cleanup guarded), read-only
client.get_thread stays unvalidated, and scheduler rows with legacy
invalid IDs record a failed dispatch instead of raising out of the
poll loop.

* docs: document canonical thread ID contract

README: caller-supplied thread IDs need not be UUIDs; the canonical
pattern and per-endpoint behavior. AGENTS.md: the shared
deerflow.utils.thread_id contract, its enforcement boundaries, and the
legacy-ID escape hatches.

* fix(gateway): close thread ID validation gaps at remaining entry points

Follow-up to the canonical thread ID contract: a full audit found the
uniform-422 coverage only reached about half of the thread_id surfaces.

- routers: 18 routes still took a bare thread_id: str — 13 in
  thread_runs.py (including the five messages/events/workspace-changes
  reads that returned 500 on the JSONL event store vs 404/empty on the
  DB store), 4 read routes in threads.py, and the suggestions route
  flagged in review. DELETE /api/threads/{id} keeps str as the declared
  legacy-cleanup escape hatch.
- client: upload_files/delete_upload/list_uploads/get_artifact now
  validate up front, fulfilling the RFC's 'all mutating entry points'
  clause (get_thread stays unvalidated as the declared legacy read path).
- tui: the /resume literal-ref fallback validates against the canonical
  contract and reports a descriptive error instead of failing deep in
  the client.
- scripts/support_bundle.py: replace the drifted dot-allowing pattern
  with a byte-identical copy of THREAD_ID_PATTERN (kept local so the
  script still runs with a broken venv).

* test(gateway): guard the canonical thread ID contract against regressions

- test_thread_id_route_contract.py: static AST sweep asserting every
  route handler with a thread_id parameter annotates ThreadId
  (whitelist: the DELETE escape hatch), plus a runtime sweep hitting
  all 44 thread_id routes with a non-canonical ID and asserting a 422
  that names thread_id, plus a websocket upgrade-rejection case.
- test_thread_id_validation.py: client entry-point validation,
  support_bundle pattern parity, and TUI literal-ref fallback tests.
- Align two tests that encoded the old contract (dotted IDs).
2026-08-01 19:42:44 +08:00
Aari
e646188ab4
fix(runtime): accept the SDK's default stream_resumable=false (#4468)
RunCreateRequest declared stream_resumable as None-only, but langgraph_sdk
defaults it to False (not None) and its payload filter only drops None, so
every SDK request carried "stream_resumable": false and was rejected with 422.
False means "no resumable stream", which is what DeerFlow already serves.

This broke every IM channel run (runs.stream and runs.create both send the
field; only runs.wait omits it) and any external langgraph_sdk client. The web
frontend was unaffected because its compatibility wrapper does not send it.

An explicit true still returns 422. The new regression test drives a real SDK
client to capture its default payload and posts that to the HTTP boundary, so a
future non-None SDK default cannot regress this silently.

Fixes #4466
2026-07-26 15:00:42 +08:00
ShitK
a4ede80deb
fix(runtime): reject unsupported run options and stream modes (#4430)
* fix(runtime): reject unsupported run options

* fix(runtime): align SDK run compatibility

* fix(frontend): avoid unsupported events stream mode

---------

Co-authored-by: Willem Jiang <willem.jiang@gmail.com>
2026-07-24 19:24:24 +08:00