mirror of
https://github.com/bytedance/deer-flow.git
synced 2026-10-26 13:16:24 +00:00
1 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
bcaf6db36a
|
feat(models): add declarative reasoning capability contract (#5780)
* feat(models): add declarative reasoning capability contract (#5073) Introduce an optional per-model `reasoning:` block beside the legacy `supports_thinking` / `supports_reasoning_effort` booleans. It declares thinking availability (unsupported | optional | required), the accepted effort values with aliases, default, and serialization path, the payload dialect, and the reasoning-history requirement. When present the booleans are derived from it and contradictory profiles fail at config load. `deerflow.models.reasoning` normalizes legacy and declared profiles into one immutable contract and resolves every caller's generic request against it. `create_chat_model` is the single enforcement point: required-thinking models never receive a synthesized disable payload, unsupported effort values never reach the provider, and the dialect synthesizes the on/off payload when no template exists. Legacy profiles keep the historical path byte-for-byte. The lead agent and subagent descriptor resolve the same policy first so run metadata reports effective values. `/api/models` and `DeerFlowClient` project the contract as `reasoning`; the frontend derives mode clamping and effort choices from it through `core/models/reasoning.ts`, and user preferences accept provider-specific effort tokens. The setup wizard's Z.AI GLM-5.3-Flash profile migrates to the contract, restoring its low/high/max effort control. * docs(models): move the reasoning contract guidance into models/AGENTS.md backend/AGENTS.md sits within 46 bytes of the 96 KiB effective-chain hard limit for the middlewares, runtime, sandbox, and subagents guides, so the new section pushed scripts/check_agent_guidance.py over it. The models guide is the nearest file for the factory and the contract module, and its chain has ample room. * fix(models): address review on the reasoning contract - vLLM dialect: the enable path now mirrors whichever chat_template_kwargs switch the template declares, like the disable path already did, so a template using the older `thinking` key no longer also grows `enable_thinking`. - Validate operator-supplied effort values at `effort.path` inside `when_thinking_enabled`, `when_thinking_disabled`, and the `thinking` shortcut against the contract, not only the profile-level value; they are forwarded when the caller chooses nothing, so the "unknown values never reach the provider" guarantee now holds for them too. - Constrain `effort.path` to dotted identifiers and reject single-segment paths that would replace a whole mapping (`extra_body`, `thinking`, `model_kwargs`, `default_headers`, `default_query`). - Z.AI GLM-5.3-Flash profile: `default: high` instead of `max`, because the default also governs summarization, title generation, and subagent calls that never choose an effort; `max` stays selectable. Documented in the config example, the configuration manual, and the design note. * fix(models): close reasoning contract review gaps * fix(models): preserve native Ollama reasoning config * fix(models): keep native reasoning strings and project reasoning into the descriptor - `ModelConfig.reasoning` also accepts the level string ChatOllama takes for gpt-oss style models (`low` / `medium` / `high`); the factory forwards both the boolean and the string on the legacy path, so profiles that passed `reasoning: high` through before the contract field existed keep loading and keep sending it. - The assembly descriptor no longer excludes `reasoning` from `model_parameters`: the native ChatOllama value and a declared contract's dialect/history/effort change the request payload, so they now move the assembly fingerprint. - e2e: the sidecar spec pinned the pre-contract body where a model without effort control still received `reasoning_effort: minimal`; the preset is now dropped for such models (the Gateway discarded it anyway), so the assertion expects the key to be absent. |